Hello Alexander,
Thank you once again for your reply. Here are the results of the command :
192.168.5.0/24 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Address: 0x15a09dc
Next-hop reference count: 1
Next hop: via reth0.300, selected
State: <Active Int>
Age: 12w5d 20:54:31
Task: IF
AS path: I
192.168.5.254/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Local Preference: 0
Next hop type: Local
Address: 0x1174324
Next-hop reference count: 24
Next hop:
Interface: reth0.300
State: <Active NoReadvrt Int>
Age: 12w5d 20:54:31
Task: IF
AS path: I
192.168.6.0/24 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Address: 0x15a0990
Next-hop reference count: 1
Next hop: via reth0.301, selected
State: <Active Int>
Age: 12w5d 20:54:31
Task: IF
AS path: I
192.168.6.254/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Local Preference: 0
Next hop type: Local
Address: 0x1174324
Next-hop reference count: 24
Next hop:
Interface: reth0.301
State: <Active NoReadvrt Int>
Age: 12w5d 20:54:31
Task: IF
AS path: I
Am I right to suppose that the mistake comes from the part in bold (no hop addresses)? Those addresses (5.254 & 6.254) are the interfaces addresses for the two problematic zones.