hi
is it possible to import static routes from one table to another and filter out some routes, in my example I would like to filter out
default gateway.
thanks
↧
rib import routes
↧
Re: Filter Based Forwarding support on st0 interface
I upgraded to D100, indeed, I am able to configure the FBF on st0 interface, but unfortunately, the FBF functionality does not work, I need to source based routing with next hop in different routing instances than the routing instance st0 interface is in, when traffic arrives at st0 interface, SRX does route lookup at current routing instance in stead of of in the routing table of egress instance, which of cause will fill, same FBF filter applied on non-st0 interface works perfectly.
↧
↧
vSRX IPSec Site to Site VPN with dual wan
Hi all,
I currently testing Route baesd IPSec VPN with dual wan deployment by vSRX D100 version. When I set it up initially, IKE getting error with Timed out. Can anyone share some suggestions on this?
Regards,
Dylen
↧
Re: Filter Based Forwarding support on st0 interface
Hi,
Firewall filters are not supported on tunnel interfaces.
↧
Re: SRX240 Need Help with vlan Routing
Hi All,
Any help ?
Your thoughts are highly appreciated
Thx,
Patryk
↧
↧
Re: Dynamic VPN
IPSec
The dynamic VPN feature (also known as remote access VPN or IPsec VPN client) further simplifies remote access by enabling users to establish Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) VPN tunnels without having to manually configure VPN settings on their PCs or laptops
With the sale of the MAG, juniper exited the SSL VPN
Now called Pulse Secure
https://www.juniper.net/us/en/pulsesecure/
↧
Re: Filter Based Forwarding support on st0 interface
This is weird, because the CLI was blocked in previous releases, now the filter is configurable, something must have changed.
↧
Tunnel loop detected with peer
We have an SRX1500 with over a hundred VPN tunnels. Every few nights we get a "IPSec negotiation loop detected with peer, Rejecting negotiation" event on our SA. Users on the remote end notice the network outage for several minutes. I have opened a JTAC case, but they really didn't tell me anything. Said our VPN configurations look good. No other issues with other VPN's on the same box. The only thing thats a bit different than other tunnels is we do specify a remote-identity with this one.
I have not really found anything related to "loop detected" messages in KB's are in the forums. Anybody have any idea what this is?
HM
↧
Re: Filter Based Forwarding support on st0 interface
I am able to get around this limitation by routing incoming traffic on st0 to an external device (a MX) and then hairpin back on physical interface (tagged vlans) via isolated routing instances, traffic flow is convoluted, but it works.
↧
↧
Re: rib import routes
Hi,
Yes absolutely.
show configuration policy-options policy-statement Get-Static
term two {
from {
instance master;
protocol static;
route-filter <IP Address> exact;
}
then accept;
}term two {
from {
instance master;
protocol static;
route-filter 0.0.0.0 exact;
}
then reject;
}
term LAST {
then reject;
}
[edit routing-instances My-New-VR]
instance-type virtual-router;
interface reth0.1
interface reth0.2
interface reth0.3
interface reth0.4
routing-options {
instance-import Get-Static;
}
Kindly go through below KB for more details:
https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB19787&actp=METADATA
Regards,
Anand
[KUDOS PLEASE! If you think I earned it!
If this solution worked for you please flag my post as an "Accepted Solution" so others can benefit..]
↧
SRX 1500 Major Alarm - PEM 1 Not Present.
Good Morning,
Is there a way I can disable the following alarm in an SRX 1500?
@
1 alarms currently active
Alarm time Class Description
2017-08-01 12:19:32 CEST Major PEM 1 Not Present >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
@
It only indicates that the PEM 1 is not present which makes sense since I have only one PEM in use. I think it is misleading (red led) and it should perhaps be categorized as a "minor alarm". I have searched the forum and google and I cannot find a way to disable it.
I am running Junos:
Model: srx1500
Junos: 15.1X49-D80.4
JUNOS Software Release [15.1X49-D80.4]
Please help. Thanks in advance.
Juan
↧
Re: SRX 1500 Major Alarm - PEM 1 Not Present.
Hi JLGC,
I have a SRX1500 with a single PEM in my lab and with 15.1X49-D100 I'm not seeing any major alarms. See output below;
But: If you have two PEMs installed in the SRX1500 and only providing power to one, then the error will show up. If this is the case, the only way to avoid the alarm is to unplug PEM1 from the firewall (maybe just extract it at let it stay in the bay retracted 2-3 cm's).
root@srx1500-nfr> show version Hostname: srx1500-nfr Model: srx1500 Junos: 15.1X49-D100.6 JUNOS Software Release [15.1X49-D100.6] root@srx1500-nfr> show chassis hardware | match Power Power Supply 0 REV 02 740-055217 1EDP7230G1E PS 400W 90-264V AC in root@srx1500-nfr> show chassis alarms No alarms currently active root@srx1500-nfr> show system alarms No alarms currently active
I hope this helps.
↧
Re: SRX 1500 Major Alarm - PEM 1 Not Present.
Hi Jonas,
First thanks for replying. As I mentioned in my previous msg I only have one PEM installed per firewall. PEM 1 is not present because it is not present at all, hense the red alarm. Please see below. I am starting to believe I may need to upgrade from [15.1X49-D80.4 to latest recommended Junos but not sure if that will clear the false alarm. Thanks:
xxx@xxx> show chassis environment
{primary:node0}
node0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class Item Status Measurement
Power FPC 0 Power Supply 0 OK
FPC 0 Power Supply 1 Absent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
snip
node1:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class Item Status Measurement
Power FPC 0 Power Supply 0 OK
FPC 0 Power Supply 1 Absent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Temp CPU Board Exhaust OK 39 degrees C / 102 degrees F
CPU Board Inlet OK 26 degrees C / 78 degrees F
snip
{primary:node0}
xxx@xxx>
↧
↧
Re: SRX 1500 Major Alarm - PEM 1 Not Present.
Hi Juan,
This issue is resolved in 15.1X49-D100 and trakced under PR1265795. Please refer page 27 from the release notes of 15.1X49-D100.
Regards,
Rahul
Please mark my solution as accepted if it helped.
↧
Unable to download latest firmware
I'm trying to download the latest firmware for my SRX345 and when i try to login to the portal as the juniper site suggests - it says my user does not have permissions. The device is registered under the email address so i dont see why i'd be getting this issue.
↧
Re: SRX 1500 Major Alarm - PEM 1 Not Present.
Thanks Rahul,
It is what I thought need to be done. Thank you for the confirmation.
Cheers,
Juan
↧
cluster active/active on firefly perimeter not working?
Hi all,
May I know if someone has been test active/active cluster using firefly perimeter and is it supported or not? Im has do some simulate test but unfortunately all the reth interface that in the RG2 cannot be ping even point to point ip address peer. If I move the reth interfacw into RG1 then its working. Is it have special command to make active/active cluster or just enough configure additional redundancy group there is RG2 only.
Thanks and appreciate any feedback
May I know if someone has been test active/active cluster using firefly perimeter and is it supported or not? Im has do some simulate test but unfortunately all the reth interface that in the RG2 cannot be ping even point to point ip address peer. If I move the reth interfacw into RG1 then its working. Is it have special command to make active/active cluster or just enough configure additional redundancy group there is RG2 only.
Thanks and appreciate any feedback
↧
↧
Re: Unable to download latest firmware
Hi,
Easy! on the same page open a case with Juniper explaining that you are entitled to download the image and they will fix it for you.
↧
SRX100 Packet Capture: limited to 1500 bytes?
Is it true that I can capture only 1500 bytes at a time with the packet capture? It can't be true. Please tell me that I am misunderstanding.
↧
Re: rib import routes
Hi
I wanted to use rib-groups and use import-rib but this one works good.
Thanks!
↧