Re: SRX650 Chassis cluster switchover 【Interfaces is LACP down】
Hello , This seems like the LACP flapped which made the corresponding interface down in the perticular node which caused the Interface monitoring down and thereby failover of the RG group .Now we need...
View ArticleRe: design solution
Hello , In this case we can use the same reth interface and brach them using different units configuration and seperate them using VLAN IDs .We can do inter- VLAN routing also using this setup . Eg...
View ArticleRe: error: Could not connect to node1 : No route to host - after power failure
Hello , First of all , you are missing the secondary FAB port from secondary Node which should be " ge-5/0/7 " . Secondly the secondary FAB link "ge-0/0/7" and ge-5/0/7" connecting switch port on...
View ArticleRe: SRX650 Chassis cluster switchover 【Interfaces is LACP down】
Hi, Prior to this, the interface is normal, Through the command "show interfaces extensive | match flapp", only the Eth1 interface flapp is found. The other physical interfaces are Up. The network is...
View ArticleRe: SRX650 Chassis cluster switchover 【Interfaces is LACP down】
Hello , Can you share the LACP config from SRX end . It may be possible that you have some LACP fast setting and while pushing the configuration the RE CPU might have spiked hight and caused the LACP...
View ArticleRe: SRX650 Chassis cluster switchover 【Interfaces is LACP down】
HI， The configuration does contain fast. reth1 { per-unit-scheduler; vlan-tagging; redundant-ether-options { redundancy-group 1; lacp { active; periodic fast; } } Thank you for your support, thank you.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: error: Could not connect to node1 : No route to host - after power failure
Thank you for your response. I have not been able to find documentation that states whether dual fabric ports should be in the same or different vlans so this is very important information you have...
View ArticleSRX 100 High CPU with small traffic
Hello, our client have srx100bJUNOS Software Release [11.4R4.4] Every day, some time somebody try to download or do something , and traffic has increases to 10Mbps. Then traffic has increased, cpu...
View ArticleRe: design solution
Thanks Sam, that mean we only need to use one link each of the firewall to each of the switch in the stack? configuration similar like below: set groups node0 system host-name srx-aset groups node0...
View ArticleSRX240 Can't commit changes
Just out of curiosity (o; I see lately some SRX240 devices sold as broken with the remark, that changes can't be commited/saved. Is this just some flash issue which can be solved easily?OTOH the flash...
View ArticleRe: system alarm 'autorecovery information needs to be saved'
Thanks as well, this helped. I did both commands on srx345.
View ArticleRe: SRX240 Can't commit changes
Hi Davorin, This should not be difficult to recover from.The options available are;1. Loading factory default .2. Pressing the reset button , which should reset the device and you can start over.3....
View ArticleRe: SRX 100 High CPU with small traffic
Hi Arturka, From the information provided I can only think that fragmentation could be causing the CPU to go high.Try disabling force-ip-reassembly and see if that helps bring down the CPU. Also the...
View Articlesrx5400 HA cluster and dual SPC
Hi, I've got two srx5400, each with two SPC cards in a HA cluster.I am aware srx5400 can have only one RE so only control port 0 (em0) can be used.All of dual control link configuration references are...
View ArticleSRX routing with redundant connections
Hi Guys, My first post here. I am trying to figure out how I can route using diverse links at the same ISP via independent SRXes and do load balacing and failover. Is this possible? I talked to the...
View ArticleRe: Should I look at cp-session or session?
look into the both CP is related to Hardware ressource management and flow session is related to subscribers traffic management , For the CP i recommend you to do upgrade
View ArticleRe: srx5400 HA cluster and dual SPC
Hi, Dual control links are not supported on an SRX5400 device due to the limited number of slots. Please go through the following link which states the same...
View ArticleRe: Should I look at cp-session or session?
Hi, The details about the CP are given in the link below :-http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.1x44/topics/concept/session-flow-central-point-for-srx-series-understanding.html The...
View ArticleRe: SRX routing with redundant connections
Hello , As per your diagram , I am assuming that the ISP is same with 2 different link wit same next hop IP for both the individual SRX . In this case we can only do loadbalancing based on some...
View ArticleRe: error: Could not connect to node1 : No route to host - after power failure
Hello , The secondary Node1 is failing in Config Sync issue which can be due to the FAB link issue , so once we finx the FAB link , I hope the clustering issue will get fixed .Then we can consentrate...
View Article